AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |
Back to Blog
Zen 3 ram speed11/21/2023 ![]() The new AMD Ryzen 5000 processors are undoubtedly one of the best current options for Gaming as we will see in the test results. In the new AMD Ryzen 5000 thanks to improvements in performance per cycle and the ability to manage multi-core processes in an excellent way we offer a noticeable improvement over the Ryzen 3000 with Zen 2 cores. Using the PCMark 10 benchmark test we can see the real performance of the AMD Ryzen 5000 using desktop applications. Both the multi-core and single-core performance maintains the figures of the previous test, making evident the differences between the 5950/5900/5800X range and the more economical 5600X processor. ![]() With the Geekbench 5 performance test we can see how the previous Cinebench results are corroborated. As we can see the processors with more cores and 105W TPD outperform the 5600X with 65W TPD in multi-core but in single core we have very similar figures. Performing the Cinebench R23 test we test how the CPU defends itself in both single-core and multi-core computing power, this test is undoubtedly one of the industry benchmarks. In this new motherboard design we have the NVMe drive at the top which is appreciated, on the other hand the Noctua NH-U12S fan is sufficient for normal use and controlled overclock. The new ASRock B550M-ITX/AC motherboard in mini-ITX format allows us to assemble a small computer with great power. To assemble the set we have opted for the following elements: Reference As we can see the Socket is still the immortal AM4, we recommend updating the BIOS as soon as the system is turned on. We perform our tests on the AMD Ryzen 5000 processors with a common hardware, we have a motherboard with the new B550 chipset fully compatible with this generation of AMD processors. ![]() With this all the integrated Cores can access this amount of memory much more efficiently reducing latency, all the cores of these processors also support SMT ( Simultaneous MultiThreading) doubling the threads (threads) of execution, as we see in the table of processors there are no versions without SMT something that we had in Zen 2. This generation of processors are based on Zen 3 cores, the main improvement in its design is the unification of the 元 cache to 32MB. As we will see in the performance tests of this benchmark, the performance per core has been substantially improved and the cycle flow has been optimized, something that was pending in these processors. At least DDR4 memory prices have dropped in recent prices so 8 x 16GB DDR4-3200 can be had for less than $400 USD, but the Threadripper PRO 5965WX will set you back $3299 USD and the ASUS Pro WS WRX80E-SAGE SE WIFI for around $950 USD.The Ryzen 5000 Vermeer 7nm CPUs are a considerable improvement over the successful 3000 series. Four packs of the Corsair CMK32GX4M2E3200C16 memory yielding 128GB of DDR4-3200 memory for $380 USD at current pricing. The Threadripper PRO 5000 series processors support up to eight memory channels and for most intensive workloads there are nice gains to enjoy out of fully utilizing all of the memory channels.įor my Threadripper PRO 5965WX testing I have been using CORSAIR Vengeance LPX 16GB DDR4-3200 modules. This is namely for reference purposes and those that may need some additional leverage with your boss or spouse if trying to justify the cost for eight memory DIMMs for the new Zen 3 Threadripper processors. For those weighing whether to pursue the full eight memory channel configuration for the new Ryzen Threadripper 5000 series or starting out with just four or six memory modules, here are some reference benchmarks across four, six, and eight memory channels with the AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX 24-core processor while running Ubuntu Linux.Īs some complementary benchmarks to my AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5965WX Linux review from earlier this month on the DIY launch-day, here are benchmarks of the 5965WX across four, six, and eight memory channels. ![]()
0 Comments
Read More
Leave a Reply. |